Like I said earlier if the (9+3) is in the denominator then it's 2. But if it's not then it's 288. The notation of the equation is bad. 288 isn't wrong but neither is 2. I'm still saying it's 2 cause I read it as a fraction cause of the / if it was a division symbol then id say 288Waffles;261965 wrote:You hit one of the major arguments of this equasion. The way it's formatted. There is no question it is 288 the way you formatted it. But with the formatting as is people are arguing the rules. Even TI treats it differently between different versions of the calculator.
One of my biggest pet peeves is the use of the ÷ symbol. Not wrong but I just prefer the / symbolizing the fraction that it is.
48/2(9+3)=?
-
sharpie
- Posts: 3564
- Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 8:59 pm
48/2(9+3)=?
gudg racing you're never gonna catch me!!
-
Boosted_da
- Posts: 652
- Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 1:43 am
48/2(9+3)=?
what ever happened to "Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally".
turbo lag psh? boost is only a down shift away
da integra now n/a... ls vtec 12-1 comp "daily"
SSM RSX-S[K20A2] - GT3561 Turbo, 1-Fab Manifold, Intercooler, 50mm Tial BOV, 38mm Tial WG, 3" DP, 3" KTeller Exhaust Piping, Vibrant TPV Muffler, 880cc Precision Injectors, Autometer Cobalt Boost/OP/AF Gauges, 18" RSL Rims, C West Front Lip, Mugen Sideskirts, ASpec Rear Lip, Type R Spoiler, Evo Carbon Hood, Tein SSP Coilovers, JDM Blackout Headlights, 6000K HIDs, KPro dyno numbers to come soon!!!
da integra now n/a... ls vtec 12-1 comp "daily"
SSM RSX-S[K20A2] - GT3561 Turbo, 1-Fab Manifold, Intercooler, 50mm Tial BOV, 38mm Tial WG, 3" DP, 3" KTeller Exhaust Piping, Vibrant TPV Muffler, 880cc Precision Injectors, Autometer Cobalt Boost/OP/AF Gauges, 18" RSL Rims, C West Front Lip, Mugen Sideskirts, ASpec Rear Lip, Type R Spoiler, Evo Carbon Hood, Tein SSP Coilovers, JDM Blackout Headlights, 6000K HIDs, KPro dyno numbers to come soon!!!
-
Waffles
- Posts: 6876
- Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 3:45 am
48/2(9+3)=?
Algebra happened to her lolBoosted_da;261971 wrote:what ever happened to "Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally".

-
MaSSaCrE
- Posts: 2167
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 2:53 am
48/2(9+3)=?
I would want to say your wrong. Like said im sure the answer could swing both ways but regardless how you look at it parenthesis come first. Maybe im wong though, I learned math wrong all my life I suppose.99PreludeSh;261953 wrote:Division comes before multiplication, equation should go from left to right.
Not quite sure how this is even an arguable problem if order of operations is used
-
99PreludeSh
- Posts: 6921
- Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 2:39 am
48/2(9+3)=?
exactly order of operations. Division ALWAYS comes before multiplication.MaSSaCrE;261976 wrote:I would want to say your wrong. Like said im sure the answer could swing both ways but regardless how you look at it parenthesis come first. Maybe im wong though, I learned math wrong all my life I suppose.
Not quite sure how this is even an arguable problem if order of operations is used
BODMAS is Brackets-Orders-Division-Multiplication-Addition-Subtraction
(9+3)48/2 = (12)48/2 = (12)24 = 288
If the answer was 2 the equation would look like this.
48/(2(9 + 3))

-
Waffles
- Posts: 6876
- Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 3:45 am
-
5thgen
- Posts: 1097
- Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 10:25 pm
48/2(9+3)=?
"A common technique for remembering the order of operations is the abbreviation "PEMDAS", which is turned into the phrase "Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally". It stands for "Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication and Division, and Addition and Subtraction". This tells you the ranks of the operations: Parentheses outrank exponents, which outrank multiplication and division (but multiplication and division are at the same rank), and these two outrank addition and subtraction (which are together on the bottom rank). When you have a bunch of operations of the same rank, you just operate from left to right. For instance, 15 ÷ 3 × 4 is not 15 ÷ 12, but is rather 5 × 4, because, going from left to right, you get to the division first. If you're not sure of this, test it in your calculator, which has been programmed with the Order of Operations hierarchy. For instance, typesetting this into a graphing calculator, you will get: 20"
division/multiplication are on the same level....as is addition/subtraction
division/multiplication are on the same level....as is addition/subtraction

-
Waffles
- Posts: 6876
- Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 3:45 am
48/2(9+3)=?
Lol, saw that one on the physics site where I am pulling most of my stuff from. I just like playing devils advocate and steph is being a good sport about it 

-
MaSSaCrE
- Posts: 2167
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 2:53 am
48/2(9+3)=?
The post that you just did 5thgen is very correct, it was how I was always taught. Multi\division is on same level along with addition\subtraction.
The way I was taught though was that parenthesis are FIRST. Regardless if you had already added what is in the parenthesis together. I was taught you proceed with the problem by cancelling out the parenthesis first as well if its a problem like the one were discussing. So therefor you would have to multiply into the parenthesis first.You wouldn't necessarily have to have the other opening parenthesis before the ..........2(9+3)
Which if you had already added them together is 48/2(12)
2(12) comes first in the way I was taught, but every teacher has there own ways in teaching I suppose.
So I still dont say im correct or that I am wrong.
The way I was taught though was that parenthesis are FIRST. Regardless if you had already added what is in the parenthesis together. I was taught you proceed with the problem by cancelling out the parenthesis first as well if its a problem like the one were discussing. So therefor you would have to multiply into the parenthesis first.You wouldn't necessarily have to have the other opening parenthesis before the ..........2(9+3)
Which if you had already added them together is 48/2(12)
2(12) comes first in the way I was taught, but every teacher has there own ways in teaching I suppose.
So I still dont say im correct or that I am wrong.
-
stolle
- Posts: 2241
- Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 5:47 pm
