I don't like the word boost....boostin....boostamos....boostetc.
It should have never been introduced to forced induction.
so na>boost
and go boost yourself.
boosted vs na
-
onecam12sec
- Posts: 328
- Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 9:10 pm
boosted vs na
why a single cam? well, it was a used, stamped JG Dynamic longblock for $700sharpie;265843 wrote:Also a 331whp d15 in an integra? Not saying it can't be done but why?
Wut?
back then i didn't know my stock b18b could make that kind of power stock. but that motor took daily beatings, and went thru 3-4 cars after me. $700 well invested if you ask me.
people who knew me didn't want to race me. and those who saw my engine bay and laughed, got laughed at after they'd race me.
I'm gon hurt some feelin's this summer
-
onecam12sec
- Posts: 328
- Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 9:10 pm
boosted vs na
i'll see if my brother or my best friend still have pictures of the engine bay. i just recently started taking pictures of my cars, that was back in 05-07 before i moved up hereBwill9886;265905 wrote:Yeah I had the same thoughts, but that was just the first thing I noticed haha!
I would actually like to see that setup.
I'm gon hurt some feelin's this summer
-
onecam12sec
- Posts: 328
- Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 9:10 pm
boosted vs na
i'm not tryin to misinform anyone, i am simply speaking from my experience. i had a car that was well built and dyno tuned, and i had a car that was a real low budget, turbocharged with 223k miles stock motor. they both worked out.Bwill9886;265842 wrote:Yeah, wait... tune matters, but you had a stock ECU and injectors on the last build?
I'm gon hurt some feelin's this summer
