boosted vs na

User avatar
5thgen
Posts: 1097
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 10:25 pm

boosted vs na

Post by 5thgen »

I don't like the word boost....boostin....boostamos....boostetc.

It should have never been introduced to forced induction.




so na>boost

and go boost yourself.
Image
User avatar
onecam12sec
Posts: 328
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 9:10 pm

boosted vs na

Post by onecam12sec »

sharpie;265843 wrote:Also a 331whp d15 in an integra? Not saying it can't be done but why?

Wut?
why a single cam? well, it was a used, stamped JG Dynamic longblock for $700
back then i didn't know my stock b18b could make that kind of power stock. but that motor took daily beatings, and went thru 3-4 cars after me. $700 well invested if you ask me.
people who knew me didn't want to race me. and those who saw my engine bay and laughed, got laughed at after they'd race me.
I'm gon hurt some feelin's this summer
User avatar
onecam12sec
Posts: 328
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 9:10 pm

boosted vs na

Post by onecam12sec »

Bwill9886;265905 wrote:Yeah I had the same thoughts, but that was just the first thing I noticed haha!

I would actually like to see that setup.
i'll see if my brother or my best friend still have pictures of the engine bay. i just recently started taking pictures of my cars, that was back in 05-07 before i moved up here
I'm gon hurt some feelin's this summer
User avatar
onecam12sec
Posts: 328
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 9:10 pm

boosted vs na

Post by onecam12sec »

Bwill9886;265842 wrote:Yeah, wait... tune matters, but you had a stock ECU and injectors on the last build?
i'm not tryin to misinform anyone, i am simply speaking from my experience. i had a car that was well built and dyno tuned, and i had a car that was a real low budget, turbocharged with 223k miles stock motor. they both worked out.
I'm gon hurt some feelin's this summer