Bill is a certified Honda Technician, I'm pretty sure you won't be "schooling" him.mike93hatch;148380 wrote:and your point?? tell me this...what should camber be at?
waiting for reply because i have a feeling you and everyone else on here are about to get schooled.. you WILL look like the retard that follows bandwagons.
edit:mike93hatch;148380 wrote:and your point?? tell me this...what should camber be at?
waiting for reply because i have a feeling you and everyone else on here are about to get schooled.. you WILL look like the retard that follows bandwagons.
bildo16;148401 wrote:you cannot generalize camber for all cars. i enjoy to some turns every now and then, but i also drive 70 miles round trip to work 4 days out of the week so i compromise with -1.2 out back, and -.5 up front. with just a little toe out. now please school me on how much camber is the best andwhyyourunitandwhyyouarebetterandwhyyourcarisbetterandwhyiamnotascoolasyou. on a daily drivin car that you do not want camber wear, i would not go any higher than what i am at. you must keep your tires rotated though or else they will wear on the inside edges.
edit: and please school me on what i must have missed through 2 years of tech school, 3 years in the field, and a 3 day hunter engineering alignment course have yet to teach me about camber.
edit:mike93hatch;148405 wrote:alright, you asked for it.
2.5-3 degrees of negative camber on a honda is a good thing. actually its BEST! camber wear? lmao. camber kits are the oldest misconception there is.
instead of wasting my time on all you sheep, im just going to cut to the chase and post some links that back up everything i would have said.
read them all carefully so there is no confusion.
http://www.hondatuningmagazine.com/tech ... aster.html
http://www.honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=2363156
http://www.honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=2365222
http://www.honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=2368866
http://www.honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=2376688
http://www.honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=2358865
sorry bud, but with all your years of schooling versus my zero schooling, i still know more than you. but thats alright, youre a dealership tech. youre all the same.
edit:mike93hatch;148407 wrote:you OBVIOUSLY fail at reading. i know this for a fact because there is no way you read all that. look at the time of my post and your post. 3 minutes apart, you cant even read all 3 pages of the first link in 3 minutes. proves what a moron you are.
AND NO, NONE OF IT IS ABOUT TRACK SHIT.
you still didnt read the first link.bildo16;148408 wrote:it is all about slightly lowered cars a DA on an eibach prokit=1 maybe 1.5 inches of drop? my car is lowered nearly three inches!!!!! tell me i dont need a camber kit and i will pull mine off, put the stock control arms in and take a fucking picture to satisfy you. my car will have AT LEAST 3 degrees negative camber, my tires will squeal under moderate turning and it WILL wear tires, i have proof.
edit:mike93hatch;148409 wrote:you still didnt read the first link.
NO you dont fucking need one. my cars have had that much camber and i dont have camber kits on them for years now. i have proof too. you want to see my tires. that squeel (which i have never heard on a honda) is from a full contact patch.... which, once again, IS A GOOD THING.
youre like everyone else, go by conventional wisdom and automatically think hey i need a camber kit because i lowered my car and its going to wear my tires out! SHEEP!
lol, i did read parts. they all pertained to the same type of suspension setup. honda had a great idea to actually progress from what they designed 20 years ago. nearly every statement you make deals with old technology. just because i dont work on old cars (like yourself) doesnt make me a retard. ive had a wide variety of experiences with all sorts of hondas (and some isuzu's) so thanks for schooling me with your ability to search HT and you fantastic copy and paste skills. maybe you should keep those outstanding skills on a site where people actually respect you.mike93hatch;148414 wrote:of course that sounds ridiculous to you. you are a tech that went to school. conventional wisdom is your best friend. like i said, youre a sheep like most people on here are.
you still refuse to read the 3 pages of the first link so now i am done with this thread.
who is the retard?
