ITBs and high compression or Turbo

J8k'S CRX · Post by **J8k'S CRX** » Sun Oct 07, 2007 5:04 pm

noob.
/thread

use search button on your local google
probly never hear from this guy again.

Silver Knight · Post by **Silver Knight** » Sun Oct 07, 2007 7:02 pm

N2HIFI;71625 wrote:to bad it has NO go now ....lawl

+1

dubbs · Post by **dubbs** » Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:41 am

stltuner;71498 wrote:The title pretty much sums up my question. Anybody have any numbers, advice, etc. I'm just stuck. I think I really just want the turbo for the sound of the blow off valve.

That's the WORST reason of all time to want a turbo.

And there's no way in hell you could have an ITB'd daily driver in the midwest. Even climate change will throw those off.

sharpie · Post by **sharpie** » Mon Oct 08, 2007 3:38 am

go with turbo. its cheaper to build a boosted street car and easyer to tune then the a high horsepower n/a motor, also itb's and high comp are a pain in the ass to tune around here with the weather changes the way they are and too be able to drive daily plus the cost of gas for a high comp car (12:1+) cause more than likely it will need more than 93 octane.

boosted hatch · Post by **boosted hatch** » Sat Oct 20, 2007 9:42 am

daily driven go boost..track car go ITB.

Gunmetal Si · Post by **Gunmetal Si** » Sat Oct 20, 2007 12:34 pm

sharpie;71715 wrote:the cost of gas for a high comp car (12:1+) cause more than likely it will need more than 93 octane.

why do u say this autozone swlls octae booster, jk, there is gas station in soco with 96 octane

boosted hatch · Post by **boosted hatch** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 8:53 am

GUNMETAL SI;73897 wrote:why do u say this autozone swlls octae booster, jk, there is gas station in soco with 96 octane

where?