Signature size

Jacques · Post by **Jacques** » Thu Mar 01, 2007 11:03 pm

My sig was removed because it violated the size policy. Most sites will limit sigs down to 600x150...why can't it be the same here?

JonDubya · Post by **JonDubya** » Thu Mar 01, 2007 11:18 pm

Because we're not most sites.

Jacques · Post by **Jacques** » Thu Mar 01, 2007 11:31 pm

JonDubya;26425 wrote:Because we're not most sites.

Hey, it's your site and I'm not telling you guys how to run things, but 50 more pixels heightwise can't possibly hurt bandwith that much. Oh well, just a suggestion.

rickles8099 · Post by **rickles8099** » Thu Mar 01, 2007 11:48 pm

Jacques;26432 wrote:Hey, it's your site and I'm not telling you guys how to run things, but 50 more pixels heightwise can't possibly hurt bandwith that much. Oh well, just a suggestion.

its not about the bandwidth. it has more to do about the way the layout of the posts are. most sites have peoples avatar/name/info to the left of the post. here it is above. and with the avatar/name/info being on top ive seen a single post take up my whole screen because the signature is so big. so to cut it down a little and not make it too obnioux, the sig limit is set at 600 x 100.

JesSi · Post by **JesSi** » Fri Mar 02, 2007 12:55 am

Jacques;26432 wrote:Hey, it's your site and I'm not telling you guys how to run things, but 50 more pixels heightwise can't possibly hurt bandwith that much. Oh well, just a suggestion.

I agree... 50 more pixels.

Pork Pie · Post by **Pork Pie** » Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:55 am

either way, love the new sig james

Phate · Post by **Phate** » Fri Mar 02, 2007 5:08 am

Pork Pie;26562 wrote:either way, love the new sig james

+1.

Jacques · Post by **Jacques** » Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:17 pm

It's actually an old sig from a couple of years back. It'd be cooler if it were bigger.