5.0

User avatar
Burnz
Posts: 103
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 5:37 pm

5.0

Post by Burnz »

deetz;45402 wrote:gears, intake manifold, and a good set of headers and then your starting to talk a lil bit more power on a stang. my dads 98 stang felt wayy different and all we did was put headers, and an offroad x-pipe on it
Yea, and he had none of that. Just a plane old intake, cat back exhaust, and some tires. And weld wheels, which are light.
User avatar
deetz
Posts: 3034
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 1:09 am

5.0

Post by deetz »

its hard to find a non modded fox anymore, i imagine he hasnt had it for long then
~chris~
johnny 5 racing- because not everyone can outrun nova!!
-scca setup 99 grand am gt
-85 cj7
00siandrew
Posts: 710
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 4:05 am

5.0

Post by 00siandrew »

deetz;45424 wrote:its hard to find a non modded fox anymore, i imagine he hasnt had it for long then
Yeah they are like 1st gen dsms, you never know what you will get with them. They will either be pretty quick and healthy or turds that have been ran to crap for 20 years.
User avatar
ludeboy
Posts: 216
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 3:30 pm

5.0

Post by ludeboy »

90CivicEx;44124 wrote:ended in like 95 and after that was onto the 4.6 shittyness.
Hmmm, just showed your ignorance of fords.
freakchris03;44674 wrote:most mustangs are a waste of time and gas.
Most likely because 90% of them would blow your doors off lol. You talk a lot of trash about Mustangs... Care to try your luck with mine?
"I'm one tough gazookas that hates all palookas that ain't on the up and square. I biffs 'em and buffs 'em and always out-roughs 'em and none of 'em gets nowhere. So keep good behavior, it's your one lifesaver, with Popeye the Sailor Man."
00siandrew
Posts: 710
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 4:05 am

5.0

Post by 00siandrew »

ludeboy;46980 wrote:Hmmm, just showed your ignorance of fords.



Most likely because 90% of them would blow your doors off lol. You talk a lot of trash about Mustangs... Care to try your luck with mine?
Well the 4.6 for the first couple years were pretty lame, not to mention I would take a 5.0 over the 4.6 anytime. The 4.6 will never impress me because the main competition, the LS1, is better in every way, shape, and form. Ford really dropped the ball with competing with Chevy until the F bodies stopped in 02.
User avatar
ludeboy
Posts: 216
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 3:30 pm

5.0

Post by ludeboy »

00siandrew;47404 wrote:Well the 4.6 for the first couple years were pretty lame, not to mention I would take a 5.0 over the 4.6 anytime. The 4.6 will never impress me because the main competition, the LS1, is better in every way, shape, and form. Ford really dropped the ball with competing with Chevy until the F bodies stopped in 02.
Actually a stock 96-98 outperforms the 5.0 with less displacement. Not to mention a 4.6 block is WAY stronger than a 5.0 block. As for ls1's, they are great motors but they dyno close to the newest 4.6 DOCH cobra motor (NA). If you drop 4v heads on a 5.4 block you will surpass ls1 power no problem. Basically all the ford motors need now and days is equal displacement to overcome the Chevy's.
"I'm one tough gazookas that hates all palookas that ain't on the up and square. I biffs 'em and buffs 'em and always out-roughs 'em and none of 'em gets nowhere. So keep good behavior, it's your one lifesaver, with Popeye the Sailor Man."