F2k>h2b

JustRob
Posts: 7884
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 7:28 pm

F2k>h2b

Post by JustRob »

Image

Image
User avatar
Waffles
Posts: 6876
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 3:45 am

F2k>h2b

Post by Waffles »

I would not say F2k>h2b considering that they are completely different applications.


EDIT: Still bad ass
Image
JustRob
Posts: 7884
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 7:28 pm

F2k>h2b

Post by JustRob »

btlfedgolf;82044 wrote:I would not say F2k>h2b considering that they are completely different applications.


EDIT: Still bad ass
:fag: Get this shit outta my thread. F2K is the new H2B.
User avatar
Spork
Posts: 6680
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 12:52 am

F2k>h2b

Post by Spork »

btlfedgolf;82044 wrote:I would not say F2k>h2b considering that they are completely different applications.


EDIT: Still bad ass
different applications?
that mother freaker just dropped an F-bomb in an EG and kept it front wheel drive :eek:
take that h-series
This post comes with a guarantee: I guarantee that I don't care what you think about it.
User avatar
Waffles
Posts: 6876
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 3:45 am

F2k>h2b

Post by Waffles »

Spork;82048 wrote:different applications?
that mother freaker just dropped an F-bomb in an EG and kept it front wheel drive :eek:
take that h-series
Yes, H2B puts a FWD non cable tranny into a car so you can run the F without running cable trannys. This puts a RWD engine in a FWD car.
Image
User avatar
sharpie
Posts: 3564
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 8:59 pm

F2k>h2b

Post by sharpie »

wow i cant beleive they finished it me and a friend wanted to attempt this about a year and a half ago but we didnt have the money its a cool swap i think someone else is working on one for an allmotor drag car in an ek
JustRob
Posts: 7884
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 7:28 pm

F2k>h2b

Post by JustRob »

btlfedgolf;82050 wrote:Yes, H2B puts a FWD non cable tranny into a car so you can run the F without running cable trannys. This puts a RWD engine in a FWD car.
2.2 liter 4-cylinder versus a 2.2 liter 4-cylinder...hmmm...Yep, your right. Theres a huge difference between these motors

[/sarcasm]
User avatar
Spork
Posts: 6680
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 12:52 am

F2k>h2b

Post by Spork »

same difference, you are making an adapter so you can run a different transmission on a motor so that you can put it in your car. as far as I am concerned, its comparing apples to apples since they are used to swap the motors into the same chassis

I'm going to have to bring back a phrase from back in the day... "Don't be Jelousy"
This post comes with a guarantee: I guarantee that I don't care what you think about it.
User avatar
sharpie
Posts: 3564
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 8:59 pm

F2k>h2b

Post by sharpie »

here is the one inline pro is working on

http://www.honda-tech.com/zerothread/2129906
User avatar
dubbs
Posts: 466
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 5:59 am

F2k>h2b

Post by dubbs »

SilverStreak;82053 wrote:2.2 liter 4-cylinder versus a 2.2 liter 4-cylinder...hmmm...Yep, your right. Theres a huge difference between these motors

[/sarcasm]
I'd say 2,000 rpm and 40 hp is a difference.