92 mpg

User avatar
Silver Knight
Posts: 5694
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 1:51 am

92 mpg

Post by Silver Knight »

wow. thats pretty kickass
DC5
ImAJandILikeToSuckMenOffForMoney
Posts: 4788
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 7:39 am

92 mpg

Post by ImAJandILikeToSuckMenOffForMoney »

I would rock that in a heartbeat and it looks badass to me
User avatar
modthesol
Posts: 3708
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 6:34 am

92 mpg

Post by modthesol »

thats bad ass but i dont think it will sell.
User avatar
Tyler
Posts: 2223
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 7:19 am

92 mpg

Post by Tyler »

i would drive one in a heartbeat
Never bring show to a go fight

Im a loser
:L33T:

[Today 09:58 AM] btlfedgolf: Its not a race car until you remove the door panels
tmarsh
Posts: 959
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 5:44 pm

92 mpg

Post by tmarsh »

Give me the technology to run 20:1 afr on a turbo motor, and you can keep the goofy 3 wheel body. If I want something sexy and super lightweight, I'll take a Porsche 550 Spyder body over that canuck monstrosity.
'98 Grand Am: Wider is Better!
kra95civic
Posts: 2484
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 3:50 am

92 mpg

Post by kra95civic »

ay to go for that guy.....nice set up but the body looking like that like risky for the box car drivers out there 2day
You can talk shit all you want! eventually noone will care about your input. :yo:
User avatar
SweetEBPSi
Posts: 1138
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 12:23 am

92 mpg

Post by SweetEBPSi »

The idea and technology is great. Its nice to see things moving forward. However, that car, will never be made do to safety. One accident and the car and driver are toast. No if they made it to where it passes safety, the mpg will fall due to the weight.
tmarsh talking to Allex wrote:I'm going to be step-daddy #4.
budget_crx
Posts: 2722
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 9:49 pm

92 mpg

Post by budget_crx »

thats the only problem i see with the car, the looks are outrageous but that wouldn't stop too many people, especially when the price is right and the gas mileage is so great. But getting that thing safe enough for the NHTSA would seem impossible. they should just use that technology on a regular car, the mpg wont be as great but still much better than stock. could you imagine an H2 making over 30mpg??? :PDT_Armataz_01_37:
Image
User avatar
SweetEBPSi
Posts: 1138
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 12:23 am

92 mpg

Post by SweetEBPSi »

budget_crx;55039 wrote:could you imagine an H2 actually being taken off-roading???
Fix it for you. Sorry. I had to.
tmarsh talking to Allex wrote:I'm going to be step-daddy #4.
User avatar
sharpie
Posts: 3564
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 8:59 pm

92 mpg

Post by sharpie »

id rather have an insight