Official Stlhondas dyno day pictures/videos

Sleepy Civic DX · Post by **Sleepy Civic DX** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 2:38 am

A couple of pics....

Chris hp208 trq198 1/4mile 14.0
Andy hp168 trq112 1/4mile (motor jumped out of car, disqualified)
Steph hp167 trq139 1/4mile 15.0
Rick (Sleepy Civic Dx) hp149 trq105 1/4mile 14.4
Jay hp146 trq111
AJ hp146 trq104 1/4mile 15.2
Chris hp145 trq103
Rick (rickles8049) hp137 trq123
Steve hp136 trq104
Bill hp135 trq146
Joe hp123 trq3,850 1/4mile 15.6
Ryan hp121 trq114 1/4mile 16.2
Alex hp117 trq110

How is the dyno innaccurate? it is 2 months old and will be checked and retuned by a rep every 2-3 months

modthesol · Post by **modthesol** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 2:50 am

only one over 200 hp??

n.yguygsr · Post by **n.yguygsr** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 2:51 am

the brakes aj shit it was those loose timberlands you had on. lol

99PreludeSh · Post by **99PreludeSh** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 2:54 am

I still dont believe the boosted cars were very accurate with the numbers because there is NOWAY Rick pulled just 137hp lol.

But I had a pretty good time thanks to everyone!

I pulled 167hp and 139tq and my quarter mile run was a 15.0, needless to say I was very shocked with what my completely BONE STOCK, with 129k miles on it car did!

n.yguygsr · Post by **n.yguygsr** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 2:54 am

i had a real good time i plan to get turbo next

modthesol · Post by **modthesol** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 2:57 am

99preludesh;30368 wrote:I still dont believe the boosted cars were very accurate with the numbers because there is NOWAY Rick pulled just 137hp lol.

But I had a pretty good time thanks to everyone!

I pulled 167hp and 139tq and my quarter mile run was a 15.0, needless to say I was very shocked with what my completely BONE STOCK, with 129k miles on it car did!

ya thats not right i hope u guys felt like u got ur moneys worth

SweetEBPSi · Post by **SweetEBPSi** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 3:19 am

90CivicEx;30359 wrote:As far as I know they keep the car in gear as to not damage anything to the equipment or car, I wouldn't think it to be to smart to slam the brakes while after the cars comeing down.

that's my .02 though

I didn't say anything about using the brake. I was just saying push the clutch in and let it wind down on it own. Plus it just looks like they did the dyno runs in 5th gear.

tmarsh · Post by **tmarsh** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 4:36 am

Some of those results are really suprising. I'm especially looking at the other b16 cars with bolt ons. Maybe my car's factory freak :dunno:

Are those numbers corrected to SAE standard or just raw data?

N2HIFI · Post by **N2HIFI** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 4:51 am

tmarsh;30393 wrote:Some of those results are really suprising. I'm especially looking at the other b16 cars with bolt ons. Maybe my car's factory freak :dunno:

Are those numbers corrected to SAE standard or just raw data?

raw data no correction, dyno was a mustang dyno which from what i understand needs a 5-10% correction.

pulls were done in either 4th gear or third gears, the 3rd gear vids are obviously the shorter pulls. There was a HP and tq difference between the two gears but to keep things consistant everybody did atleast one 4th gear pull.

Chris

deetz · Post by **deetz** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 4:55 am

N2HIFI;30396 wrote:raw data no correction, dyno was a mustang dyno which from what i understand needs a 5-10% correction.

pulls were done in either 4th gear or third gears, the 3rd gear vids are obviously the shorter pulls. There was a HP and tq difference between the two gears but to keep things consistant everybody did atleast one 4th gear pull.

Chris

5-10% is sayin it lightly, i dynoed on a mustang dyno with my eclipse and made 198 whp, then went to rons at axis 2 weeks later and dynoed 235whp.

stlhondas