A few pics I took tonight

99PreludeSh · Post by **99PreludeSh** » Thu Jan 25, 2007 8:37 pm

I tried out the tripod and they didnt come out grainy or anything but kinda boring and dark. Please help!

Gosh I suck

JonDubya · Post by **JonDubya** » Thu Jan 25, 2007 8:40 pm

Increasing exposure time will fix that.

99PreludeSh · Post by **99PreludeSh** » Thu Jan 25, 2007 9:02 pm

JonDubya;16487 wrote:Increasing exposure time will fix that.

i set it to the ISO setting is there a way to change that?

Potts1 · Post by **Potts1** » Thu Jan 25, 2007 9:20 pm

lower your iso
download neat image

how long of an exposure was this for?

JonDubya · Post by **JonDubya** » Thu Jan 25, 2007 9:21 pm

99preludesh;16490 wrote:i set it to the ISO setting is there a way to change that?

ISO setting is different than exposure time. ISO refers to how responsive the "film" is to light. Higher the ISO setting, more light gets absorbed at once. So in low light situations sometimes it's better to use a higher iso setting, but in doing so, it increases granularity.

99PreludeSh · Post by **99PreludeSh** » Thu Jan 25, 2007 9:22 pm

JonDubya;16492 wrote:ISO setting is different than exposure time. ISO refers to how responsive the "film" is to light. Higher the ISO setting, more light gets absorbed at once. So in low light situations sometimes it's better to use a higher iso setting, but in doing so, it increases granularity.

OK well we need to meet up this weekend so I can get a clue of what your talking about!

Potts1;16491 wrote:lower your iso
download neat image

how long of an exposure was this for?

Whatever the camera was set at. I dont know sorry

Potts1 · Post by **Potts1** » Thu Jan 25, 2007 9:23 pm

JonDubya;16492 wrote:ISO setting is different than exposure time. ISO refers to how responsive the "film" is to light. Higher the ISO setting, more light gets absorbed at once. So in low light situations sometimes it's better to use a higher iso setting, but in doing so, it increases granularity.

If im shooting cars at night, or something that isnt moving, I have my iso as low as it can go. As long as shes got the tripod and a timer on her camera, a lower iso would turn out better.

Potts1 · Post by **Potts1** » Thu Jan 25, 2007 9:26 pm

99preludesh;16493 wrote:OK well we need to meet up this weekend so I can get a clue of what your talking about!

Whatever the camera was set at. I dont know sorry

If your using photobucket (this is on mine atleast) theres an option below the picture when your just looking at one pic, not the page of pictures, called exif data, click on that and it should tell you all the settings from your camera.

99PreludeSh · Post by **99PreludeSh** » Thu Jan 25, 2007 9:32 pm

Potts1;16496 wrote:If your using photobucket (this is on mine atleast) theres an option below the picture when your just looking at one pic, not the page of pictures, called exif data, click on that and it should tell you all the settings from your camera.

File size: 145885 bytes
File date: 2007:01:25 13:33:44
Camera make: SONY
Camera model: DSC-W100
Date/Time: 2007:01:24 23:40:16
Resolution: 800 x 600
Flash used: No
Focal length: 15.1mm
Exposure time: 0.067 s (1/15)
Aperture: f/4.0
ISO equiv.: 1250
Whitebalance: Auto
Metering Mode: matrix
Exposure: program (auto)

Spork · Post by **Spork** » Thu Jan 25, 2007 9:42 pm

Id say a 1-2 full seconds of exposure would have been very nice for the lighting there... and whatever program you use to resize, stop. the pictures are really choppy. use something like photoshop to do it, it makes it all smoooth

stlhondas