Its 1989 Again....

99BlackHatch · Post by **99BlackHatch** » Wed Feb 11, 2009 5:44 pm

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uePDlF3VbrE"]YouTube - 1992 Ford Taurus[/ame]

99PreludeSh · Post by **99PreludeSh** » Wed Feb 11, 2009 6:02 pm

and it's still hideous

5thgen · Post by **5thgen** » Wed Feb 11, 2009 6:02 pm

"they call this the ranch"

Silver Knight · Post by **Silver Knight** » Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:37 pm

so you gonna get one, Curt?

bildo16 · Post by **bildo16** » Wed Feb 11, 2009 8:33 pm

SLOSHONOGO;164227 wrote:awwww. hate on it alllllll you want. its still more impressive than any accord ever produced by Honda.

.

well lets bring facts to the table

best selling cars:
No. 1 Toyota Camry
No. 2 Honda Accord <---------- There is the accord
No. 3 Honda Civic
No. 4 Toyota Corolla
No. 5 Chevrolet Impala
No. 6 Nissan Altima
No. 7 Honda CR-V
No. 8 Chevrolet Cobalt
No. 9 Toyota Prius
No. 10 Dodge Caravan

Specs on 2010 SHO:
365 HP out of a twin turbo V6 (honda makes 305 hp out of a NA 3.7 Liter v6)
Fuel economy is at 16mpg City and 25mpg HWY (hondas MPG is rated at 17&25mpg) Those were specs from a TL-S. To choose a Taurus SHO over a TL-S is absolutely retarded. The msrp on the SHO=$37,995 The TL-S=$38,505

kikkinasphalt · Post by **kikkinasphalt** » Wed Feb 11, 2009 8:42 pm

bildo16;164307 wrote:well lets bring facts to the table

best selling cars:
No. 1 Toyota Camry
No. 2 Honda Accord <---------- There is the accord
No. 3 Honda Civic
No. 4 Toyota Corolla
No. 5 Chevrolet Impala
No. 6 Nissan Altima
No. 7 Honda CR-V
No. 8 Chevrolet Cobalt
No. 9 Toyota Prius
No. 10 Dodge Caravan

Specs on 2010 SHO:
365 HP out of a twin turbo V6 (honda makes 305 hp out of a NA 3.7 Liter v6)
Fuel economy is at 16mpg City and 25mpg HWY (hondas MPG is rated at 17&25mpg) Those were specs from a TL-S. To choose a Taurus SHO over a TL-S is absolutely retarded. The msrp on the SHO=$37,995 The TL-S=$38,505

say what you will.

according to you

the tl-s costs more, has less power, less options, no all wheel drive.

ill take the SHO

like i said..

no honda accord (acura tl-whatever) produced in 2010 will compare to the new SHO

deal with it.

oh and BTW, american dollars staying on american soil.

edit* i was wrong about the all wheel drive.

Clayton · Post by **Clayton** » Wed Feb 11, 2009 9:03 pm

SLOSHONOGO;164310 wrote:say what you will.

according to you

the tl-s costs more, has less power, less options, no all wheel drive.

ill take the SHO

like i said..

no honda accord (acura tl-whatever) produced in 2010 will compare to the new SHO

deal with it.

oh and BTW, american dollars staying on american soil.

wow awfully cocky for having just a brief defination of the drivetrain and output figures. you can have all the power in the world and still perform like a hunk of shit. i know this is your allah of vehichles but you better bring alot more to the table than to even get me intrested.

kikkinasphalt · Post by **kikkinasphalt** » Wed Feb 11, 2009 9:07 pm

06sik20z3;164312 wrote:wow awfully cocky for having just a brief defination of the drivetrain and output figures. you can have all the power in the world and still perform like a hunk of shit. i know this is your allah of vehichles but you better bring alot more to the table than to even get me intrested.

nevermind.

big pipe · Post by **big pipe** » Wed Feb 11, 2009 9:12 pm

if it actually does sell, i bet they wont be twin turbo.

nomocars23 · Post by **nomocars23** » Wed Feb 11, 2009 9:18 pm

Cliffs?
edit:

SLOSHONOGO;164310 wrote:
oh and BTW, american dollars staying on american soil.

the accords american made aint it????