Ex-honda owner...

Spork · Post by **Spork** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 1:37 am

this comparison is still wrong. you should be comparing that motor to something like the K24 which has the same displacement, and the same stock horsepower/torque numbers.

N2HIFI · Post by **N2HIFI** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 2:14 am

Spork;81734 wrote:this comparison is still wrong. you should be comparing that motor to something like the K24 which has the same displacement, and the same stock horsepower/torque numbers.

well duh but K-series FTL :omg:

chris

2dot4 · Post by **2dot4** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 5:01 am

Like I said, I'm not comparing my car to anyone's car.

I'm comparing numbers - if someone is used to seeing gains of 60hp from F/I, then why would they be disappointed with 100hp? That's all I'm saying - I'm not comparing my car - I just didn't understand why you would expect more than 100hp from F/I...on the majority of 4cyl motors, 100hp from F/I is probably the 98th percentile. It's a decent gain.

I understand what you're saying, but I'm not comparing my car to anyone elses - I just didn't understand why 100hp was below expectation...seems high to me.

And given that the k24a4 has the same compression and displacement as the 2az-fe, you can assume f/i would give that motor 100whp also on 7psi. I don't disagree.

I don't want you guys to think I'm picking on Hondas - I was just trying to figure out why he though 100hp was low - that's all.

stl.tc.king · Post by **stl.tc.king** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 7:50 pm

In for pork steaks.

Its Pat! · Post by **Its Pat!** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 3:41 pm

you still owe me one matthew.